Key result
This review outlines current management strategies for atrial flutter, emphasizing reversion to and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, rate control, and the evolving role of ablation.
This review highlights current management strategies for atrial flutter, focusing on rhythm control and the role of ablation.
Supports rhythm and rate control strategies in atrial flutter; leaves open optimal ablation timing pending prospective trials.
After atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter (AFL) is the most important and most common atrial tachyarrhythmia. Atrial flutter describes an electrocardiographic model of atrial tachycardia >or=240/min, with a uniform and regular continuous wave-form. There is classically a 2:1 conduction across the atrioventricular (AV) node; as a result, the ventricular rate is usually one-half the flutter rate in the absence of AV node dysfunction. AFL can be harmful by impairing the cardiac output and by encouraging atrial thrombus formation that can lead to systemic embolization. There are four major concerns that must be addressed in the treatment of AFL: reversion to normal sinus rhythm (NSR); maintenance of NSR; control of the ventricular rate; and prevention of systemic embolization. Our review will highlight strategies for reverting patients back to NSR and then maintaining them in NSR, with emphasis on the recent updates, including the role of ablation in the management of atrial flutter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhar et al. (2009) conducted a review in Atrial flutter. Management strategies was evaluated. This review outlines current management strategies for atrial flutter, emphasizing reversion to and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, rate control, and the evolving role of ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: