Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many number-theoretic algorithms rely on a result of Ankeny, which states that if the Extended Riemann Hypothesis (ERH) is true, any nontrivial multiplicative subgroup of the integers modulo m omits a number that is O ( log 2 m ) O({log ^2}m) . This has been generalized by Lagarias, Montgomery, and Odlyzko to give a similar bound for the least prime ideal that does not split completely in an abelian extension of number fields. This paper gives a different proof of this theorem, in which explicit constants are supplied. The bounds imply that if the ERH holds, a composite number m has a witness for its compositeness (in the sense of Miller or Solovay-Strassen) that is at most 2 log 2 m 2{log ^2}m .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Bach (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: