Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Concerns about disrespect and abuse (D&A) experienced by women during institutional birth have become critical to the discourse on maternal health. The rapid growth of the field from diverse points of origin has given rise to multiple and, at times, confusing interpretations of D&A, pointing to the need for greater clarity in the concepts themselves. Furthermore, attention to measurement of the problem has been excessive when viewed in relation to the small amount of work on critical drivers of disrespect and abuse. This paper raises some key issues of conceptualisation and measurement for the field, puts forward a working definition, and explores two critical drivers of D&A - intersecting social and economic inequality, and the institutional structures and processes that frame the practice of obstetric care. By identifying gaps and raising questions about the deeper causes of D&A, we point to potentially fruitful directions for research and action.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gita Sen
Public Health Foundation of India
Bhavya Reddy
University of British Columbia
Aditi Iyer
Pacific Environment
Reproductive Health Matters
Public Health Foundation of India
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20ffb2202ec1db3916d45d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: