Key result
NOAC use linked to ~78% lower ischemic stroke rate vs no treatment in AF.
Why the study?
Several novel oral anticoagulants are licensed for AF in the United Kingdom, but real-world data were needed on outcomes, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following their introduction.
Does oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy reduce the incidence of ischaemic stroke compared to no treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=42,966)
Does oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy reduce the incidence of ischaemic stroke compared to no treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Highlights temporal trends of increasing NOAC prescribing and exposes the significantly elevated risk of ischaemic stroke in NVAF patients receiving no antithrombotic treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Absence of AF prescription links to markedly higher stroke rates; supports anticoagulation in NVAF while leaving NOAC-warfarin comparisons open.
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Several novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are licensed for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment in the United Kingdom. We describe the incidence and mortality from ischaemic stroke and major bleeding in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in England, including treatment patterns before/following introduction of NOACs, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs post-onset of these events. METHOD: Data were extracted from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Rates of ischaemic stroke per 1000 patient-years (95% CI) were 9.4 (3.8-15.0) with NOACs, 10.4 (8.0-12.9) with warfarin, 20.1 (16.4-23.8) with aspirin, 21.3 (5.3-37.2) with other antiplatelets and 43.6 (39.3-47.8) in patients without AF prescription. Major bleeding occurred at a similar rate with different treatments. All-cause mortality rates were 42.8 (31.4-54.3) with NOACs, 46.3 (41.1-51.5) with warfarin, 56.5 (50.5-62.4) with aspirin, 102.2 (76.2-128.3) with other antiplatelets and 412.8 (399.6-426.0) with no AF prescription. Mean annual National Health Service healthcare costs up to 1 year post-index were lowest in patients receiving aspirin plus other antiplatelets without an event (£6152), and highest in patients with an event without AF prescriptions (£17 957). By extrapolation, national AF HRU in the United Kingdom in 2016 was estimated at £8-16 billion annually. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide temporal insights into AF treatment patterns and outcomes for NVAF patients in England and highlight the need to review higher stroke risk AF patients not receiving antiplatelet/antithrombotic prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhai et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=42,966). NOACs vs. No AF prescription was evaluated on Incidence of ischaemic stroke per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 3.8-15.0). Rates of ischaemic stroke per 1000 patient-years were 9.4 with NOACs, 10.4 with warfarin, and 43.6 in patients without an AF prescription.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: