MEF-AlloSite: an accurate and robust Multimodel Ensemble Feature selection for the Allosteric Site identification model

Abstract A crucial mechanism for controlling the actions of proteins is allostery. Allosteric modulators have the potential to provide many benefits compared to orthosteric ligands, such as increased selectivity and saturability of their effect. The identification of new allosteric sites presents prospects for the creation of innovative medications and enhances our comprehension of fundamental biological mechanisms. Allosteric sites are increasingly found in different protein families through various techniques, such as machine learning applications, which opens up possibilities for creating completely novel medications with a diverse variety of chemical structures. Machine learning methods, such as PASSer, exhibit limited efficacy in accurately finding allosteric binding sites when relying solely on 3D structural information. Scientific Contribution Prior to conducting feature selection for allosteric binding site identification, integration of supporting amino-acid–based information to 3D structural knowledge is advantageous. This approach can enhance performance by ensuring accuracy and robustness. Therefore, we have developed an accurate and robust model called Multimodel Ensemble Feature Selection for Allosteric Site Identification (MEF-AlloSite) after collecting 9460 relevant and diverse features from the literature to characterise pockets. The model employs an accurate and robust multimodal feature selection technique for the small training set size of only 90 proteins to improve predictive performance. This state-of-the-art technique increased the performance in allosteric binding site identification by selecting promising features from 9460 features. Also, the relationship between selected features and allosteric binding sites enlightened the understanding of complex allostery for proteins by analysing selected features. MEF-AlloSite and state-of-the-art allosteric site identification methods such as PASSer2. 0 and PASSerRank have been tested on three test cases 51 times with a different split of the training set. The Student’s t test and Cohen’s D value have been used to evaluate the average precision and ROC AUC score distribution. On three test cases, most of the p-values (0. 05) and the majority of Cohen’s D values (> 0. 5 > 0. 5) showed that MEF-AlloSite’s 1–6% higher mean of average precision and ROC AUC than state-of-the-art allosteric site identification methods are statistically significant.