According to Pekrun et al. (2023), the construct of achievement emotions has been operationalized through three dimensions: (1) valence ( i.e. , pleasant/unpleasant emotions), (2) arousal ( i.e. , activating/deactivating emotions), and (3) temporal relation ( i.e. , prospective, in-activity and retrospective emotions). Based on these three dimensions, Pekrun et al. (2023) has proposed the taxonomy of achievement emotions as a 2 × 2 × 3 dimensional structure. To date, a robust questionnaire is still lacking to measure state achievement emotions in reference to the 2 × 2 × 3 Pekrun’s et al. (2023) model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop three valid and reliable questionnaires measuring students’ prospective, in-activity and retrospective state achievement emotions in physical education. Four stages were followed: (1) based on a literature review on achievement emotions and a committee process validation, preliminary versions of the three questionnaires were built; (2) the factor structures and internal reliabilities were established in a first study with 1159 secondary school students; (3) the factor structures were confirmed by comparing confirmatory factor analyses and exploratory structural equation modeling in a second study with 1019 secondary school students; (4) internal and concurrent validities were assessed with 656 students. The stages followed for the development of the three questionnaires demonstrated strong support for their psychometric properties and factor structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebouillat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: