Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a theory of how perception provides a basis for moral knowledge. To do this, the paper sketches a theory of perception, explores the sense in which moral perception may deserve that name, and explains how certain moral properties may be perceptible. It does not presuppose a causal account of moral properties. If, however, they are not causal, how can we perceive, say, injustice? Can it be observable even if injustice is not a causal property? The paper answers these and other questions by developing an account of how moral properties, even if not causal, can figure in perception in a way that grounds moral knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Audi (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: