Key result
A 6-week blood-flow-restricted interval training intervention increased NHE1 density by ~45% (P<0.05) and enhanced capacity for pH regulation during dynamic exercise compared to control.
Why the study?
To assess how blood-flow-restricted interval-training affects the capacity of the leg muscles for pH regulation during dynamic exercise in physically trained men.
Does blood-flow-restricted interval training improve the capacity of leg muscles for pH regulation during dynamic exercise in physically trained men?
Does blood-flow-restricted interval training improve the capacity of leg muscles for pH regulation during dynamic exercise in physically trained men?
Blood-flow-restricted interval training increases the capacity for pH regulation during dynamic exercise primarily by enhancing muscle lactate-dependent H+-transport function and blood H+-buffering capacity.
Aim To assess how blood‐flow‐restricted (BFR) interval‐training affects the capacity of the leg muscles for pH regulation during dynamic exercise in physically trained men. Methods Ten men (age: 25 ± 4y; : 50 ± 5 mL∙kg −1 ∙min −1 ) completed a 6‐wk interval‐cycling intervention (INT) with one leg under BFR (BFR‐leg; ~180 mmHg) and the other without BFR (CON‐leg). Before and after INT, thigh net H + ‐release (lactate‐dependent, lactate‐independent and sum) and blood acid/base variables were measured during knee‐extensor exercise at 25% (Ex25) and 90% (Ex90) of incremental peak power output. A muscle biopsy was collected before and after Ex90 to determine pH, lactate and density of H + ‐transport/buffering systems. Results After INT, net H + release (BFR‐leg: 15 ± 2; CON‐leg: 13 ± 3; mmol·min −1 ; Mean ± 95% CI), net lactate‐independent H + release (BFR‐leg: 8 ± 1; CON‐leg: 4 ± 1; mmol·min −1 ) and net lactate‐dependent H + release (BFR‐leg: 9 ± 3; CON‐leg: 10 ± 3; mmol·min −1 ) were similar between legs during Ex90 ( P > .05), despite a ~142% lower muscle intracellular‐to‐interstitial lactate gradient in BFR‐leg (−3 ± 4 vs 6 ± 6 mmol·L −1 ; P < .05). In recovery from Ex90, net lactate‐dependent H + efflux decreased in BFR‐leg with INT ( P < .05 vs CON‐leg) owing to lowered muscle lactate production (~58% vs CON‐leg, P < .05). Net H + gradient was not different between legs (~19%, P > .05; BFR‐leg: 48 ± 30; CON‐leg: 44 ± 23; mmol·L −1 ). In BFR‐leg, NHE1 density was higher than in CON‐leg (~45%; P < .05) and correlated with total‐net H + ‐release (r = 0.71; P = .031) and lactate‐independent H + release (r = 0.74; P = .023) after INT, where arterial [ ] and standard base excess in Ex25 were higher in BFR‐leg than CON‐leg. Conclusion Compared to a training control, BFR‐interval training increases the capacity for pH regulation during dynamic exercise mainly via enhancement of muscle lactate‐dependent H + ‐transport function and blood H + ‐buffering capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christiansen et al. (2020) studied this question. Blood-flow-restricted (BFR) interval-training vs. Interval-training without BFR was evaluated on Net H+ release during exercise at 90% of incremental peak power output (mmol·min−1) (p=> .05). A 6-week blood-flow-restricted interval training intervention increased NHE1 density by ~45% (P<0.05) and enhanced capacity for pH regulation during dynamic exercise compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: