Key result
Right atrial collision time was significantly longer in patients with typical atrial flutter than controls (132.6 vs 99.1 ms; P<0.001), with an AUC of 0.96 for diagnosing atrial flutter.
Why the study?
Typical AFL risk increases with RA size and scarring causing reduced conduction velocity; measuring circuit traversal time via right atrial collision time (RACT) may provide a novel marker of propensity to develop AFL.
Does right atrial collision time (RACT) accurately identify patients with a propensity for typical atrial flutter?
Case-Control (n=98)
No
Does right atrial collision time (RACT) accurately identify patients with a propensity for typical atrial flutter?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Right atrial collision time (RACT) is a novel and highly accurate electrophysiological marker for identifying patients with a propensity for typical atrial flutter.
INTRODUCTION: The risk of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is increased proportionately to right atrial (RA) size or right atrial scarring that results in reduced conduction velocity. These characteristics result in propagation of a flutter wave by ensuring the macro re-entrant wave front does not meet its refractory tail. The time taken to traverse the circuit would take account of both of these characteristics and may provide a novel marker of propensity to develop AFL. Our goal was to investigate right atrial collision time (RACT) as a marker of existing typical AFL. METHODS: This single-centre, prospective study recruited consecutive typical AFL ablation patients that were in sinus rhythm. Controls were consecutive electrophysiology study patients >18 years of age. While pacing the coronary sinus (CS) ostium at 600 ms, a local activation time map was created to locate the latest collision point on the anterolateral right atrial wall. This RACT is a measure of conduction velocity and distance from CS to a collision point on the lateral right atrial wall. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis, 41 with atrial flutter and 57 controls. Patients with atrial flutter were older, 64.7 ± 9.7 versus 52.4 ± 16.8 years (<.001), and more often male (34/41 vs. 31/57 [.003]). The AFL group mean RACT (132.6 ± 17.3 ms) was significantly longer than that of controls (99.1 ± 11.6 ms) (p < .001). A RACT cut-off of 115.5 ms had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.7% and 93.0%, respectively for diagnosis of atrial flutter. A ROC curve indicated an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-1.0, p < .01). CONCLUSION: RACT is a novel and promising marker of propensity for typical AFL. This data will inform larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryckman et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in Typical atrial flutter (n=98). Right atrial collision time (RACT) vs. Controls (electrophysiology study patients without typical atrial flutter) was evaluated on Diagnosis of atrial flutter (AUC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.0, p=< .01). Right atrial collision time was significantly longer in patients with typical atrial flutter than controls (132.6 vs 99.1 ms; P<0.001), with an AUC of 0.96 for diagnosing atrial flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: