Evaluation must take into account both executive and legislative politics and their interactions. This implies an evaluation process that can be represented as a five‐part continuum, and requires numerous departures from past thinking about evaluation. The evaluator must assume a major share of the responsibility for translating policy questions into knowledge that is credible, timely, responsive, and usable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eleanor Chelimsky (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: