The dc conductivity for the t-J model is exactly obtained at t=J and for the Hubbard model in one dimension. Our calculation is carried out for arbitrary band filling by use of the finite-size-scaling method based on the Bethe-ansatz solution under twisted boundary conditions. The effective transport mass defined as the inverse of the conductivity serves as a sensitive probe of the metal-insulator transition. The effective mass is extremely enhanced near half-filling both for the t-J model at t=J and the repulsive Hubbard model, which is a direct evidence of the metal-insulator transition due to the electron correlation. We observe that the large antiferromagnetic coupling J in the t-J model increases the effective mass. On the other hand, the conductivity in the attractive Hubbard model exhibits quite different properties from the repulsive models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawakami et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: