PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Digestive Endoscopy1 citations

Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Diseases Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography

View Full Paper
TKTakamichi KuwaharaKHKazuo HaraNMNobumasa Mizuno

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the capabilities of artificial intelligence in diagnosing pancreatic diseases through endoscopic ultrasonography.
  • Conducted a structured literature search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.
  • Analyzed various AI models, including deep learning architectures like ResNet and YOLO.
  • Explored multimodal approaches combining imaging and clinical data.
  • AI demonstrated diagnostic accuracy ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 across studies.
  • Only one AI model has received approval in Japan, with limited external validation.
  • Challenges included inconsistent case labeling and varying diagnostic criteria across institutions.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being applied to medical imaging; however, the evidence base for endoscopic ultrasonography-based AI (EUS-AI) remains limited. We conducted a structured literature search (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) for studies on AI for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases using EUS images. Overall, 1 detection and 17 classifications of pancreatic tumors, 4 classifications of cystic lesions, and 4 focused on parenchymal or station recognition were reported in recent peer-reviewed publications. Deep learning architectures, such as ResNet, EfficientNet, VGG, UNet++, YOLO, and custom convolutional networks, were utilized. Multimodal models combine imaging with clinical or cytological data. Reported accuracy ranged from 0.84 to 0.94; however, only a small number of studies performed external validation with enough data to confidently support their findings. Only one model has been approved in Japan with unpublished technical details. Significant challenges include limited data from single institutions, inconsistent case labeling, varying diagnostic criteria, and internal validation, which may overestimate the actual performance of the AI models. Future directions include establishing nationwide systems for collecting and sharing EUS images, applying large language models to assist in reporting and patient explanation, and exploring the use of AI to support or partially automate EUS procedures through integration with robotics. With the first commercial systems now appearing, continued innovation and rigorous validation are expected to accelerate the clinical usage of EUS-AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuwahara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16effehttps://doi.org/10.1111/den.70171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper