PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Procedia Computer Science0 citationsOpen Access

Risk-Aware Dynamic Ensembling for Time-Series Forecasting under Concept Drift: A Frugal Adaptation Framework

View Full Paper
HAHussein Ahmad AhmadSMSeyyed Kasra MortazaviTBTaha Benarbia

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a dynamic ensembling framework for time-series forecasting that addresses concept drift without incurring high computational costs.
  • Introduced the Sliding Window Selector (SWS) for dynamic ensemble prediction using frozen experts PatchTST and DLinear.
  • Implemented a statistical heuristic with an Exponential Moving Average error tracker and softmax-based weighting.
  • Evaluated framework on Energy and Finance datasets during synthetic drift scenarios.
  • Achieved an average 1.95-2.13% MAE improvement while confining peak errors to static baseline levels.
  • Demonstrated a 29% reduction in Time-to-Recover (TTR) during recovery phases.
  • Showed domain-adaptive capabilities without the need for hyperparameter retuning.

Abstract

Deep learning models such as Transformers (e.g., PatchTST) and linear-centric architectures (e.g., DLinear) achieve state-of-the-art performance on stationary benchmarks. However, real-world data streams exhibit concept drift and regime shifts that challenge static models, often leading to “silent failures” where peak error spikes dangerously. While meta-learners or frequent retraining can mitigate drift, they incur high computational costs unsuitable for resource-constrained edge environments. This paper presents the Sliding Window Selector (SWS), a training-free, computationally frugal dynamic ensemble that navigates the stability-plasticity dilemma by combining two frozen experts: PatchTST (steady) and DLinear (volatile). We introduce a rigorous statistical heuristic relying on an Exponential Moving Average (EMA) error tracker (α = 0.3) coupled with softmax-based weighting. Crucially, we propose a novel Distress Fallback mechanism that enforces a Value-at-Risk (VaR) style constraint when ensemble reliability degrades beyond a historical confidence interval. We evaluate our framework on two datasets (Energy and Finance) under controlled synthetic drift scenarios (3σ and 5σ). Results across 3 random seeds demonstrate: (i) an average 1.95-2.13% MAE improvement while strictly maintaining peak error at or below the static baseline, (ii) superior recovery dynamics, reducing Time-to-Recover (TTR) by 29%, and (iii) domain-adaptive behavior without hyperparameter retuning. SWS offers a transparent, low-latency baseline for operational forecasting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16f023https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.04.168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper