Demonstrates energy-efficient autonomous UAV navigation, highlighting significant battery savings.
Battery endurance limits commercial quadcopter UAVs to 15–25 minutes per charge — a fundamental propulsive constraint that passive energy harvesting approaches, which recover at most 0.002% of hover power from structural vibration, cannot meaningfully address at the propulsion level. Existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) comparative studies for autonomous UAV navigation evaluate algorithms on task-success rate alone, ignoring energy expenditure. This paper proposes an energy-aware multi-objective reward function with a per-step energy penalty (w_e = −0.20) and a battery-scaled goal bonus (+200·(1+0.5·b/100)), creating a 43% reward differential between energy-efficient and energy-wasteful arrivals. Three algorithms — Deep Q-Network (DQN), Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO with GAE), and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC with reparameterisation trick and twin critics) — are implemented in pure NumPy and compared across five random seeds over 200,000 training steps. SAC achieves Pareto-optimality: 82.2±2.7% success with 24.2±1.8% battery use; PPO: 71.7±3.1% / 29.2±1.8%; DQN: 57.8±2.6% / 36.1±2.2%; A*+PID: 43.5±5.2% / 48.9±4.7% (with full obstacle knowledge). SAC’s 24.7 pp battery advantage over A*+PID translates to a real-world propulsive energy saving of approximately 49–69 W·h over a nominal 15–20 minute DJI F450 mission. ANOVA yields F = 93.96 (p < 0.001); all pairwise comparisons are significant after Bonferroni correction; Cohen’s d ≥ 3.6. Ablation confirms each reward component contributes independently. SAC maintains above 68.7% success under combined sensor noise and wind disturbance without retraining. All code is available in Appendix A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
OMAR et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: