Evaluates congestion regulation using a new signal control framework in urban networks, indicating enhanced throughput.
Urban traffic networks under high-demand and incident-like perturbations can evolve from stable operation to cascading congestion, increasing delay, stop-and-go traffic, fuel or energy consumption, and traffic-related emissions. These effects make congestion regulation an important component of sustainable urban traffic management. Existing signal control methods still focus mainly on local delay reduction or short-horizon response, limiting their ability to regulate congestion propagation and stress-induced network degradation. This paper proposes Mamba-PTC, a coordinated reinforcement learning framework for urban signal control in heterogeneous traffic networks. The framework combines centralized multi-intersection control with a simplified Mamba-style sequence encoder and a transition-aware objective optimized by PPO. To connect control with network-level traffic dynamics, we introduce a transition risk indicator for online regulation and macroscopic observables for evaluation, including a composite congestion measure and an instability-amplification proxy. Experiments on stressed heterogeneous urban networks show that Mamba-PTC improves the throughput–duration profile while reducing congestion degradation indicators under heavy load and perturbation. Matched control comparisons, ablation analysis, and cross-network validation further show that these gains arise from the joint effect of temporal representation, transition-aware objective design, and coordinated control. The results suggest that coordinated reinforcement learning can support sustainable network operation by regulating congestion growth in stressed urban traffic networks. The findings provide a basis for designing congestion-aware signal control strategies, robustness evaluation protocols, and future intelligent traffic management systems for stressed urban networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouyang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: