Reports elastic scattering cross sections in strontium atoms, highlighting implications for low-energy electron interactions.
Total, momentum-transfer, and differential cross sections, together with spin-polarization (Sherman) functions, are reported for elastic scattering of low-energy electrons from neutral strontium atoms over the energy range 0.001–15 eV. The calculations are performed within a fully relativistic Dirac framework for the continuum states. The target structure is described using multi-configuration Dirac–Hartree–Fock wavefunctions obtained with the GRASP2018 package, while continuum orbitals are generated using the recently developed GRASPC extension. Long-range target polarization effects are incorporated using a dipole model potential, and exchange interactions are treated explicitly for the large and small components of the continuum wavefunctions. Particular attention is given to the ultralow-energy regime, where reliable cross section data for Sr remain limited. The calculated total cross section exhibits a broad maximum near 1 eV, while the momentum-transfer cross section shows a shallow minimum near 0.05–0.06 eV. The differential cross sections are in good agreement with earlier static-exchange-plus-polarization calculations over much of the 1–5 eV range, whereas at lower energies, visible differences appear, especially at forward angles where the results are most sensitive to the polarization interaction. In the ultralow-energy region, the present differential cross sections remain smooth and show no indication of additional low-lying shape resonances within the adopted model. The calculated Sherman functions follow the general trends of earlier theoretical studies at higher energies and decrease rapidly in the sub-eV range. Overall, the present results provide a consistent relativistic dataset for elastic e–Sr scattering at low energies, with emphasis on the near-threshold region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syty et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: