This conjecture proposes a model explaining forces between material entities through mutual winding in space, inviting further exploration.
This paper proposes the core thesis of mutual winding between material entities and their adherence to space. Matter relies on interaction forces to construct mutual-winding associations with one another, thereby realizing adherence and binding to space, which in turn embodies the natural coupling characteristic established between matter and space through mutual winding. The mutual-winding coupling action between material entities is the core prerequisite for matter to be able to adhere to the ontological substrate of space. Through an idealized thought experiment of a spiral winding configuration, this paper deduces the formation mechanism of the coupling configuration formed by mutual winding between material entities and their adherence to space, elucidates the Theorem of Force Inability of a Single Body and the Theorem of Force Generation by Multiple Bodies in the absolute vacuum, and derives the origin of forces—a field effect derived from the mutual-winding coupling of two or more material entities within the same spatial system. This paper distinguishes between the ontological space of absolute vacuum and the material-accommodating space of human cognition, ultimately constructing a new spatial theoretical system with the mutual winding of matter at its core. (This paper aims to provide a new idealized abstract model for the exploration of spacetime structure. This model is a natural philosophy conjecture of matter, and has not yet undergone independent experimental verification. It may therefore be revised or overturned by future rigorous testing. The author makes this conjecture publicly available and earnestly invites colleagues in physics and the philosophy of science to rigorously examine its logical coherence and physical reality.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanlei Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: