Demonstrates improved shielding duration in defense operations using multi-UAV smoke jamming bombs, suggesting enhanced protection against missiles.
To counter the threat of advanced missile technology, smoke jamming bombs have emerged as a crucial defensive tool due to their high cost-effectiveness. The advancement of unmanned aerial vehicle technology has enabled dynamic adjustments to the timing and positioning of smoke release. This paper proposes a multi-UAV cooperative optimization framework for smoke jamming bomb deployment, aiming to maximize the target’s effective shielding duration. Firstly, three-dimensional kinematic models for missiles, UAVs, smoke jamming bombs, and smoke clouds are established. An effective shielding judgment mechanism that is computable and reproducible is constructed based on the “line-segment-sphere intersection” criterion and systematic sampling of the target surface. Secondly, a dual simulated annealing algorithm is designed to achieve global-local collaborative search, with optimization strategies dynamically adapted to different scenarios including single-UAV single-bomb, single-UAV multi-bomb, and multi-UAV multi-bomb configurations. Meanwhile, the range of decision variables is reduced through UAV heading angle constraints to improve computational efficiency. Finally, experimental Verification is conducted in the scenario of defending a fixed high-value target. The results show that the single-UAV deployment scheme achieves an effective shielding duration of 4.59 seconds, the three-UAV cooperative scheme reaches a total shielding duration of 11.21 seconds, and the five-UAV cooperative scheme extends the duration to 18.94 seconds. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the flight azimuth angle has a significant impact on the shielding effect, while the flight speed exhibits strong robustness. This framework provides systematic theoretical support and practical deployment strategies for multi-UAV cooperative defensive operations, holding important application value in the field of military defense.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: