Descriptive survey investigates the connection between recreational facility awareness, patronage, and residents’ well-being.
This study is on Recreational Facility Awareness and Availability: Implications for Patronage and Residents’ Well-Being in Cross River State. The study is guided by two research hypotheses in line with the two objectives of the study. The population of this study comprises 741,55 residents of Calabar Municipality The study adopted a descriptive survey design using mixed method approach, key informant interviews were conducted among participants that were purposively selected, a structured questionnaire administered and key Informant Interview to 400 respondents selected through purposive and simple random sampling technique. The data were analyzed Multiple Regression Analysis and Chi-square tests. Results revealed a statistically significant relationship between public awareness and the level of patronage and availability recreational facilities significantly influences the well-being of residents. This implies that as residents visit recreational facilities more frequently, during preferred times, and experience favorable return factors such as good service or affordability, their sense of well-being increases. Since the two variables are significant at p < 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected, affirming that the availability and use of recreational facilities significantly influence the overall well-being of residents in Calabar Municipality. Additionally, the study established that factors such as income level, proximity, cost of access, and availability of amenities play a significant role in influencing patronage. It was recommended among other that Government agencies and recreational facility operators should develop comprehensive, multi-channel awareness campaigns, including social media, community events, and partnerships with schools and local organizations to increase knowledge of recreational opportunities
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chukwuogo Ego (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: