PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition0 citationsOpen Access

Rheological characterisation and printability assessment of an optimised bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting

View Full Paper
AUAlice UptonAMAthina MylonaGZGeorgina Zimbitas

Key Points

  • The research aims to validate the rheological properties and printability of a newly optimized bioink for 3D bioprinting.
  • Employs Design of Experiment (DoE) methodology to target viscosity.
  • Conducts flow curve analysis, oscillatory amplitude, and frequency sweep tests to assess rheological properties.
  • Performs thixotropy tests and temperature ramp testing to evaluate structural integrity and viscosity behavior.
  • Demonstrates a stable viscoelastic response in the bioink during oscillatory tests.
  • Shows rapid viscosity recovery after high shear in thixotropy tests with no gelation in relevant temperature ranges.
  • Validates the bioink's suitability for cell-laden printing applications.

Abstract

Design of Experiment (DoE) methodology for target viscosity, and now subjected to comprehensive rheological validation. Flow curve analysis confirms the bioink's shear-thinning profile, supporting its suitability for extrusion. Oscillatory amplitude and frequency sweep tests reveal a stable viscoelastic response within the linear viscoelastic region. In combination with pronounced shear-thinning behaviour and rapid thixotropic recovery, this supports the bioink's ability to maintain structural integrity following deposition. A three-stage thixotropy test demonstrates rapid viscosity recovery following high shear, while temperature ramp testing shows expected increases in viscosity as temperature decreases, with no gelation observed in the printing-relevant range. Collectively, these findings validate the formulation's suitability for cell-laden printing applications and offer a reproducible rheological benchmark for future bioink development in soft tissue engineering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Upton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2117bfd499ed480b1708e1https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2026.2681894
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability2017 · 948 citations
  2. 2Biphasic Granular Bioinks for Biofabrication of High Cell Density Constructs for Dermal Regeneration2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Influence of the physico-chemical bioink composition on the printability and cell biological properties in 3D-bioprinting of a liver tumor cell line2023 · 17 citations
  4. 4Chemical crosslinking of biopolymeric scaffolds: Current knowledge and future directions of crosslinked engineered bone scaffolds2017 · 496 citations
  5. 5Utilising design of experiment to design an optimised bioink for 3D bioprinting2025 · 7 citations