Evaluates thermal predictions in System-in-Package technology using machine learning models, suggesting optimal options for efficiency and accuracy.
System-in-Package (SiP) technology integrates processors, memory stacks, and radio-frequency modules within millimeter-scale enclosures, generating localized thermal peaks that passive cooling cannot address and that are too costly for finite-element solvers to track in real time. Machine learning offers a tractable alternative, but ensemble and generative families have not been jointly evaluated for this task. This work has three objectives: (1) to assess whether ensemble and generative models can predict node-level temperatures in SiP modules with surrogate-grade accuracy; (2) to quantify how a structural mismatch between a generative training objective and a deterministic regression task affects prediction quality; and (3) to identify the family offering the best trade-off between accuracy, computational efficiency, and interpretability. Three paradigms are compared on a finite-element dataset of 10,201 nodes: Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and a Variational Autoencoder using normalized three-dimensional coordinates as inputs. Random Forest delivers the strongest accuracy (mean squared error 0.098 °C2; coefficient of determination 0.997); Extreme Gradient Boosting attains the lowest inference latency (0.0044 ms per node, 0.8 MB); the Variational Autoencoder incurs a two-orders-of-magnitude regression penalty consistent with its generative objective but preserves a temperature-coherent latent geometry. Ensemble methods are recommended for accurate, interpretable thermal prediction, while the Variational Autoencoder suits downstream anomaly detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oukaira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: