A lack of a widely accepted laboratory procedure for determining concrete shear strength remains a significant obstacle to consistent comparison of experimental results and calibration of analytical models. Unlike established shear setups, the proposed method uses controlled boundary conditions and a simple specimen to minimise parasitic effects and promote a shear-dominated response. This paper presents a novel experimental setup for evaluating the Mode II (in-plane shear, sliding along a crack plane) shear strength of plain high-strength concrete, and establishes the baseline response, validity, and sensitivity of the setup. An experimental programme was conducted on six plain high-strength concrete mixtures (compressive strength fc ≈ 60 f c ≈ 60 –80 MPa) to isolate mix-design effects through controlled variations in mixture parameters. Mixtures were tested under four distinct loading configurations: fully compressed, partial compression, mixed-mode compression, and shear-dominated, to capture the transition from measuring compressive strength to shear strength. Complementary finite-element simulations in ATENA were conducted to investigate how each configuration influences the stress state and to verify the experimentally observed failure modes. Pearson correlation coefficients between configuration-specific peak stresses indicate that the shear-dominated configuration shows weak-to-moderate coupling with the other configurations ( $$r=0.17$$ r = 0.17 with fully compressed; $$r=0.41$$ r = 0.41 with partial compression; $$r=0.36$$ r = 0.36 with mixed-mode compression), supporting that its peak response is comparatively distinct from the compression-governed regimes. Comparison with selected shear-strength estimation models based on different setups yielded close agreement in the investigated strength range, with most points for the best-performing models lying within the ±15% band and mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.48–1.21 MPa. Both correlation analysis and analytical comparison support the hypothesis that the proposed setup provides a reliable and practical baseline for isolating shear-dominated response, enabling improved comparison between studies and supporting future standardisation of shear strength testing in concrete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeidi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: