Assesses energy performance and carbon implications in residential ZEB design, suggesting comprehensive evaluations are crucial.
The recast Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) accelerates the transition from nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) to zero-emission buildings (ZEBs), requiring solar readiness and life-cycle Global Warming Potential (GWP) disclosure. Yet operational performance, future-climate adaptation and whole-life carbon (WLC) are still often assessed separately, limiting actionable evidence for residential ZEB design in northern climates. This study provides an integrated design-decision framework coupling annual IDA-ICE simulations under five weather scenarios, including Urban Heat Island (UHI)-adjusted present and 2080 RCP8.5 + UHI files, with an EN 15978/Level(s)-based WLC assessment in One Click LCA for twelve design cases of a Lithuanian dwelling. For the PV-equipped baseline, heating electricity decreases by 24% and cooling increases by 31% from present conditions to 2080 RCP8.5 + UHI. External shading and night purge provide the strongest annual cooling and operative-temperature-exceedance reductions. The ZEB baseline reduces WLC by 19.0% relative to A0; the biogenic-insulation green-roof case gives the lowest non-storage WLC (−25.2%); and battery-assisted cases provide the largest reductions under the static B6 electricity factor (up to −52.1%). The findings provide case-study evidence that EPBD-aligned residential ZEB design should evaluate passive cooling, PV/storage and material choices jointly, rather than sequentially, when developing future performance thresholds and design guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grinevičiūtė et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: