Key result
An electronic frailty index using a gradient boosting survival tree model outperformed random survival forests and multivariate Cox regression for predicting all-cause mortality (AUC 0.93, C-index 0.96).
Why the study?
Electronic frailty indices can serve as useful surrogate measures of frailty, motivating the development and assessment of a machine learning-based electronic frailty index to predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR.
Does an electronic frailty index developed using machine learning predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Observational (n=450)
Yes
Does an electronic frailty index developed using machine learning predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An electronic frailty index developed using a gradient boosting survival tree machine learning model can efficiently predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR, outperforming traditional Cox regression models.
Background Electronic frailty indices can be useful surrogate measures of frailty. We assessed the role of machine learning to develop an electronic frailty index, incorporating demographics, baseline comorbidities, healthcare utilization characteristics, electrocardiographic measurements, and laboratory examinations, and used this to predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transaortic valvular replacement (TAVR). Methods This was a multi-centre retrospective observational study of patients undergoing for TAVR. Significant univariate and multivariate predictors of all-cause mortality were identified using Cox regression. Importance ranking of variables was obtained with a gradient boosting survival tree (GBST) model, a supervised sequential ensemble learning algorithm, and used to build the frailty models. Comparisons were made between multivariate Cox, GBST and random survival forest models. Results A total of 450 patients (49% females; median age at procedure 82.3 (interquartile range, IQR 79.0-86.0)) were included, of which 22 died during follow-up. A machine learning survival analysis model found that the most important predictors of mortality were APTT, followed by INR, severity of tricuspid regurgitation, cumulative hospital stays, cumulative number of readmissions, creatinine, urate, ALP, and QTc/QT intervals. GBST significantly outperformed random survival forests and multivariate Cox regression (precision: 0.91, recall: 0.89, AUC: 0.93, C-index: 0.96, and KS-index: 0.50) for mortality prediction. Conclusions An electronic frailty index incorporating multi-domain data can efficiently predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. A machine learning survival learning model significantly improves the risk prediction performance of the frailty models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=450). Electronic frailty index (gradient boosting survival tree model) vs. Random survival forests and multivariate Cox regression was evaluated on All-cause mortality prediction. An electronic frailty index using a gradient boosting survival tree model outperformed random survival forests and multivariate Cox regression for predicting all-cause mortality (AUC 0.93, C-index 0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: