Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
End-to-end speaker embedding systems have shown promising performance on speaker verification tasks. Traditional end-to-end systems typically adopt softmax loss as training criterion, which is not strong enough for training discriminative models. In this paper, we adapt the additive margin softmax (AM-Softmax) loss, which is originally proposed for face verification, to speaker embedding systems. Furthermore, we propose a novel ensemble loss, called ensemble additive margin softmax (EAM-Softmax) loss, for speaker embedding by integrating Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) into the speaker embedding system with the AM-Softmax loss. Experiments on a large-scale dataset VoxCeleb show that AM-Softmax loss is better than traditional loss functions, and approaches using EAM-Softmax loss can outperform existing speaker verification methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: