Why the study?
Does dynamic vectorcardiography improve the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared to standard 12-lead ECG in patients with chronic left bundle-branch block?
Does dynamic vectorcardiography improve the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared to standard 12-lead ECG in patients with chronic left bundle-branch block?
Dynamic vectorcardiography provides superior diagnostic accuracy (79%) for detecting acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic left bundle-branch block compared to standard 12-lead ECG criteria.
May support dynamic vectorcardiography for AMI diagnosis in chronic LBBB; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria were evaluated and compared with dynamic vectorcardiography for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in 33 patients with chronic left bundle-branch block. In 14 patients a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made, but it was found that none of the seven most promising ECG criteria suggested in the literature could alone or in combination diagnose acute myocardial infarction. QRS vector difference evolution showed the same kind of pattern as that for patients with narrow QRS-complex. By using a predefined specific pattern, a diagnostic accuracy of 79% was achieved. The results indicate that dynamic vectorcardiography is a better tool for diagnosing and monitoring acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block than standard 12-lead ECGs taken on admission and after 12-24 h.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunnar Gunnarsson Peter Eriksson (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: