Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Official corruption has always plagued the conduct of public affairs and taxed every generation to keep it within reasonable bounds. Concerned governments have tried to apply whatever available remedies came to hand with varying success. Yet whenever one of corruption's many manifestations seemed to diminish, so another would demand attention. Combating it was and remains a tireless affair requiring continual vigilance and experimentation. This paper seeks to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach The paper studies the history of official corruption and efforts to combat it. Findings This checkered history of anti‐corruption efforts shows how the repertoire of techniques expands and how the corrupt evade their application. This everlasting battle of wits depends much on how seriously people and governments take the challenge of corruption, the nature of how public power is exercised, the triumph in governance of self‐interest over the general public interest, the level of personal integrity particularly at the apex of society, and fortune in selection of right targets. Nothing succeeds like success which, given institutional and human weaknesses in local cultures, is so difficult to achieve. Originality/value The paper provides an original study of the history of official corruption, efforts to fight it and the problems that are encountered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerald E. Caiden (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: