PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2005ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)207 citationsOpen Access

Social fragmentation, deprivation and urbanicity: relation to first-admission rates for psychoses

JAJudith AllardyceHGHarper GilmourJAJacqueline M. Atkinson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social disorganisation, fragmentation and isolation have long been posited as influencing the rate of psychoses at area level. Measuring such societal constructs is difficult. A census-based index measuring social fragmentation has been proposed. AIMS: To investigate the association between first-admission rates for psychosis and area-based measures of social fragmentation, deprivation and urban/rural index. METHOD: We used indirect standardisation methods and logistic regression models to examine associations of social fragmentation, deprivation and urban/rural categories with first admissions for psychoses in Scotland for the 5-year period 1989-1993. RESULTS: Areas characterised by high social fragmentation had higher first-ever admission rates for psychosis independent of deprivation and urban/rural status. There was a dose-response relationship between social fragmentation category and first-ever admission rates for psychosis. There was no statistically significant interaction between social fragmentation, deprivation and urban/rural index. CONCLUSIONS: First-admission rates are strongly associated with measures of social fragmentation, independent of material deprivation and urban/rural category.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Allardyce et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2123e623521dddf4c3cf76https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.5.401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper