Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare 2 commercially available actigraphs. DESIGN: Subjects wore the Actiwatch L and the Basic Mini-Motionlogger for 2 nights. SETTING: Naturalistic. PARTICIPANTS: 20 healthcare workers aged 24 to 64 years. MEASUREMENTS: Measures included sleep latency, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Actiwatch L data were analyzed at 3 sensitivity settings. RESULTS: The Mini-Motionlogger reported more total sleep time, less wake after sleep onset, and greater sleep efficiency than the Actiwatch L set at high sensitivity. It also reported more wake after sleep onset than the Actiwatch L set at low sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices achieved similar overall performance when the Actiwatch L was set at medium sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: