Why the study?
Tilt table testing for neurally mediated syncope requires specialized equipment often unavailable in emergency rooms and clinics, prompting evaluation of PR interval and heart rate variability parameters as potential diagnostic indicators.
Does a prolonged PR interval predict positive tilt table test results in patients with suspected neurally mediated syncope?
Does a prolonged PR interval predict positive tilt table test results in patients with suspected neurally mediated syncope?
A prolonged baseline PR interval (>160 ms) on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring is significantly associated with positive tilt table test results, suggesting higher resting parasympathetic tone in patients susceptible to neurally mediated syncope.
May aid identification of patients likely to have positive tilt testing; leaves open whether it should guide management in neurally mediated syncope.
BACKGROUND: Neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is the primary cause of temporary and self-limiting loss of consciousness. The tilt table test (TTT) has been consistently employed as a supplementary diagnostic tool for syncope evaluation. However, TTT requires specialized equipment, which is lacking in several emergency room and clinic environments. We hypothesized that patients susceptible to NMS may have higher parasympathetic tone. Thus, this study investigates the correlation between PR interval and Herat rate variability parameters as indicators of parasympathetic tone and TTT results. METHODS: We included 213 patients referred to our cardiology clinic with an impression of NMS in 2022 and 2023. Data was retrospectively collected from 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring recordings, TTT results, and patients' history and physical examination records. RESULTS: The analysis of the PR interval revealed a mean duration of 155 ms (95% CI: 148.61, 161.39) in negative TTT patients and 164.21 ms (95% CI: 158.44, 169.97) in positive TTT patients, indicating a statistically significant difference between two groups (p = 0.035). We also found that patients with a PR interval duration exceeding 160 ms demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of positive TTT compared to those with a PR interval duration of less than 160 ms (p < 0.001, OR: 3.911, 95% CI: 2.143, 7.140). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a PR interval longer than 160 milliseconds as a valuable tool for predicting TTT results and identifying patients at higher risk of NMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikoo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: