INTRODUCTION A lexical transducer, first discussed in Karttunen, Kaplan and Zaenen 1992, is a specialised finite-state automaton that maps inflected surface forms to lexical forms, and vice versa. The lexical form con- sists of a canonical representation of the word and a sequence of tags that show the morphological characteristics of the form in question-and its syntactic category. For ex- ample, a lexical transducer for French might relate the surface form veut to the lexical form vouloir+IndPr+SG+P3. In order to map between these two forms, the trans- ducer may contain a path like the one shown in Fig. 1. v o u 1 o i r +IndP+SG+P3 v e u t Fig. 1 Transducer path as well. as generation (vouloir+lndP+SG+P3 - veut ). Analysis and generation differ only with respect to the choice of the input side (surface or lexical). The transducer and the analysis/generation algorithm are the same in both directions. Other advantages that lexical transducers have over other methods of morpho
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauri Karttunen (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: