Although the laws and professional codes encourage whistle-blowing, there is a lack of effective arrangements to guide external auditors on how to blow the whistle upon discovery of audit-related wrongdoing committed by audit colleagues. Using a four-stage participatory research method, we explore the professional judgement and decision-making process that external auditors go through as well as factors influencing their decisions to report wrongdoing by colleagues. The consensus results from the interviews conducted enable us to construct a whistle-blowing protocol that can be adopted in audit organisations and the profession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alleyne et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: