Why the study?
Screening for AF enables early intervention to potentially decrease stroke, but existing methods require professional monitoring and involve high costs.
Does a machine learning classifier using modified entropy scale (MESC) indices accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ECG recordings?
Does a machine learning classifier using modified entropy scale (MESC) indices accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ECG recordings?
A novel machine learning approach using modified entropy scale indices and regularograms can accurately detect atrial fibrillation from RR interval series, demonstrating high accuracy across multiple databases.
BACKGROUND: Screening the general public for atrial fibrillation (AF) may enable early detection and timely intervention, which could potentially decrease the incidence of stroke. Existing screening methods require professional monitoring and involve high costs. AF is characterized by an irregular irregularity of the cardiac rhythm, which may be detectable using an index quantifying and visualizing this type of irregularity, motivating wide screening programs and promoting the research of AF patient subgroups and clinical impact of AF burden. METHODS: We calculated variability, normality and mean of the difference between consecutive RR interval series (denoted as modified entropy scale-MESC) to quantify irregular irregularities. Based on the variability and normality indices calculated for long 1-lead ECG records, we created a plot termed a regularogram (RGG), which provides a visual presentation of irregularly irregular rates and their burden in a given record. To inspect the potency of these indices, they were applied to train and test a machine learning classifier to identify AF episodes in gold-standard, publicly available databases (PhysioNet) that include recordings from both patients with AF and/or other rhythm disturbances, and from healthy volunteers. The classifier was trained and validated on one database and tested on three other databases. RESULTS: Irregular irregularities were identified using normality, variability and mean MESC indices. The RGG displayed visually distinct differences between patients with vs. without AF and between patients with different levels of AF burden. Training a simple, explainable machine learning tool integrating these three indices enabled AF detection with 99.9% accuracy, when trained on the same person, and 97.8%, when trained on patients from a different database. Comparison to other RR interval-based AF detection methods that utilize signal processing, classic machine learning and deep learning techniques, showed superiority of our suggested method. CONCLUSION: Visualizing and quantifying irregular irregularities will be of value for both rapid visual inspection of long Holter recordings for the presence and the burden of AF, and for machine learning classification to identify AF episodes. A free online tool for calculating the indices, drawing RGGs and estimating AF burden, is available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keidar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: