Research on how textual enhancement (TE) affects classroom-based L2 acquisition of grammatical morphemes has shown mixed results. When enhanced conditions were compared with un-enhanced conditions; some studies demonstrated significant effects for textual enhancement; some reported no effect or negative effects and others reported only partial effects for textual enhancement. In contrast; research on how structured input (SI) impacts L2 acquisition of grammatical morphemes has shown consistently beneficial effects. Combining TE and SI; the present study introduces textually enhanced structured input (TESI) as a treatment. The main purpose of this study is to present and examine the differential effects of two types of input-based language instruction on how learners interpret and produce the third-person singular form of the Spanish preterit. Although TESI did not prove to be more beneficial than the un-enhanced treatment in the present study; both types of instruction resulted in improvement over time without explicit grammatical information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peart et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: