In search of a mental model‐like concept for group‐level modeling

In system dynamics, we care about mental models, because it is what we attempt to describe, understand, and improve using qualitative maps and computer simulation models. But if we are developing maps and models from a group of individuals, can we still call what we are trying to study a mental model? The main difference between individual and group‐level phenomena is that in a group setting interaction and communication among individuals shape what is represented in maps and models. This paper attempts to clarify the object of our group‐level modeling by surveying existing literature searching for concepts similar to “mental model” at the group level. The survey leads to an insight that what we attempt to represent with our maps and models varies widely by our selection of modeling methods, and how we define our object will draw attention to a different set of theoretical literature.