Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The issue of whether tidal forces really affect seismicity has been raised many times in the literature. Nevertheless, even though there seems to be a kind of consensus that such effects do exist, no quantitative estimates are available to relate tide parameters to changes in the level of seismic activity. Such estimation for aftershocks of large earthquakes near Kamchatka is the goal of the present study. We consider the influence on seismicity due to ocean tides only, because their effects are stronger than those of solid earth tides. Accordingly, we only consider earthquakes that occurred in the ocean. One important feature that distinguishes the present study from most other such research consists in the fact that we study the height of ocean tides and its derivative rather than tidal phases as the decisive factors. We considered 16 aftershock sequences of earthquakes near Kamchatka with magnitudes of 6 or greater. We also examined shallow background earthquakes along the coast of Kamchatka. Our basic model of aftershock rate was the Omori–Utsu law. The background seismicity distribution was assumed to be uniform over time. In both of these cases we used the actual distributions in space. The heights of sea tides were estimated using the FES 2004 model (Lyard et al., 2006). The variation in activity from what the basic model assumes in relation to tidal wave height and its time derivative was estimated by the method of differential probability gain. The main practical result of this study consists in estimates of averaged differential probability gain functions for aftershock rate with respect to both of the considered factors. These estimates can be used for earthquake hazard assessment from aftershocks with ocean tides incorporated. The results of our analysis show a persistent tendency of aftershock rate increasing during periods when the ocean tide decreased at a high rate. For the background events, we found a typical tendency of events rate increasing when the ocean tide decreased with high tidal amplitudes. The difference in the main factors that affect aftershocks and background seismicity suggest the inference that the effects of tides on aftershocks are more likely to be direct dynamic initiation of events during high strain rates, while the effects on the background events were static in character.
Баранов et al. (Tue,) studied this question.