Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Non-response in survey studies is a growing problem and, being usually selective, it leads to under- or overestimation of health outcomes in the follow-up. We followed both respondents and non-respondents by registry linkage to determine whether there is a risk of death, related to non-response at baseline. METHODS: Sample data of biennial surveys to 12-18-year-old Finns in 1979-1997 were linked with national death registry up to 2001. The number of respondents was 62,528 (79.6%) and non-respondents 16,081 (20.4%). The average follow-up was 11.1 years, totalling 876,400 person-years. The risk of death between non-respondents and respondents was estimated by hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS: The number of deaths per 100,000 person-years were 229 in non-respondents and 447 in respondents (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5-2.6). The hazard ratios of death were for intoxication 3.2 (95% CI: 1.9-5.4), for disease 3.1 (95% CI: 2.2-4.1), for violence-related injury 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5-2.6) and for unintentional injury 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) in non-respondents vs. respondents. The association between non-response and death increased with age at baseline, and the increase persisted after the age of 25. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated significantly increased rates of death among adolescent non-respondents in a follow-up. The highest hazard ratios were seen in disease- and violence-related deaths. The death rate varied between respondents and non-respondents by death type. Increased rates of death persisted beyond the age of 25.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattila et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: