PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 7, 2005Journal of Clinical Oncology185 citations

Oral Cancer Prevention and the Evolution of Molecular-Targeted Drug Development

View Full Paper
SLScott M. LippmanJSJon SudbøWHWaun Ki Hong

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The multifaceted rationale for molecular-targeted prevention of oral cancer is strong. Oral cancer is a major global threat to public health, causing great morbidity and mortality rates that have not improved in decades. Oral cancer development is a tobacco-related multistep and multifocal process involving field carcinogenesis and intraepithelial clonal spread. Biomarkers of genomic instability, such as aneuploidy and allelic imbalance, can accurately measure the cancer risk of oral premalignant lesions, or intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Retinoid-oral IEN studies (eg, of retinoic acid receptor-beta, p53, genetic instability, loss of heterozygosity, and cyclin D1) have advanced the overall understanding of the biology of intraepithelial carcinogenesis and of preventive agent molecular mechanisms and targets-important advances for monitoring preventive interventions and assessing cancer risk and pharmacogenomics. Clinical management of oral IEN varies from watchful waiting to complete resection, although complete resection does not prevent oral cancer in high-risk patients. New approaches, such as interventions with molecular-targeted agents and agent combinations in molecularly defined high-risk oral IEN patients, are urgently needed to reduce the devastating worldwide consequences of oral cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lippman et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a212ee44900b5cb0d9d1b74https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.09.128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Increased expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)‐2 in DMBA‐induced hamster cheek pouch carcinogenesis and chemopreventive effect of a selective COX‐2 inhibitor celecoxib2004 · 32 citations
  2. 2Clinical Correlations of DNA Content Parameters, DNA Ploidy, and S-Phase Fraction in Head and Neck Cancer2003 · 2 citations
  3. 3Nuclear DNA content and p53 immunostaining in metachronous preneoplastic lesions and subsequent carcinomas of the oral cavity1996 · 21 citations
  4. 4Retracted: Comparison of histological grading and large-scale genomic status (DNA ploidy) as prognostic tools in oral dysplasia2001 · 66 citations
  5. 5Cyclooxygenase-2 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Pharmacologic Targets for Chemoprevention2005 · 401 citations