Why the study?
Randomized trials of DOACs highly selected their populations, leaving limited evidence regarding their efficacy and safety in special clinical subgroups such as elderly, obese, underweight, frail, cancer patients, and those with bioprosthetic heart valves with NVAF.
Does DOAC therapy improve stroke prevention and safety compared to warfarin in special populations with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does DOAC therapy improve stroke prevention and safety compared to warfarin in special populations with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes the evidence for DOAC use in special NVAF populations (elderly, obese, frail, cancer, bioprosthetic valves) that are widely represented in clinical practice but were often excluded from pivotal trials.
Currently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-line anticoagulant strategy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). They are characterized by a more favorable pharmacological profile than warfarin, having demonstrated equal efficacy in stroke prevention and greater safety in terms of intracranial bleeding. The study population in the randomized trials of DOACs was highly selected, so the results of these trials cannot be extended to specific populations such as obese, elderly, frail, and cancer patients, which, on the other hand, are sub-populations widely represented in clinical practice. Furthermore, due to the negative results of DOAC administration in patients with mechanical heart valves, the available evidence in subjects with biological heart valves is still few and often controversial. We sought to review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly, obese, underweight, frail, cancer patients, and in patients with bioprosthetic heart valves with NVAF to clarify the best anticoagulant strategy in these special and poorly studied subpopulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carbone et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: