AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of community-based supports in promoting abstinence from substance use and related problems. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (n = 150) discharged from residential substance abuse treatment facilities were assigned randomly to either an Oxford House recovery home or usual after-care condition and then interviewed every 6 months for a 24-month period. INTERVENTION: Oxford Houses are democratic, self-run recovery homes. MEASUREMENTS: Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the effect of predictive variables on wave trajectories of substance use, employment, self-regulation and recent criminal charges. Regressions first examined whether predictor variables modeled wave trajectories by condition (Oxford House versus usual after-care), psychiatric comorbidity, age and interactions. FINDINGS: At the 24-month follow-up, there was less substance abuse for residents living in Oxford Houses for 6 or more months (15.6%), compared both to participants with less than 6 months (45.7%) or to participants assigned to the usual after-care condition (64.8%). Results also indicated that older residents and younger members living in a house for 6 or more months experienced better outcomes in terms of substance use, employment and self-regulation. CONCLUSIONS: Oxford Houses, a type of self-governed recovery setting, appear to stabilize many individuals who have substance abuse histories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: