PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 1994The Journal of Comparative Neurology246 citations

Development of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio)

View Full Paper
JBJohn BurrillSEStephen S. Easter

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Studies of the projection from the vertebrate retina have contributed significantly to current concepts of neural development. The zebrafish has recently become a favored system for the study of development in general and neural development in particular. Although the development of both the optic nerve and the retinotectal projection of the zebrafish has been described, the retinofugal projection in its entirety has not. This paper describes it and also addresses the issue of projectional exuberance: i.e., transient projections to targets that are not innervated in the adult. The retinofugal projection of embryonic and larval zebrafish (32 hours to 7 days post-fertilization) was labeled by intraocular injection of DiI (1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3',tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) and then studied in wholemounts and sections. The first optic axons crossed the chiasm at 32 hours post-fertilization and projected in a straight line to reach the tectum at about 44 hours. At 48 hours, a few optic axons deviated along either the tract of the posterior commissure or the tract of the postoptic commissure. By 72 hours (about the time of hatching) optic axons arborized in ten distinct regions, termed arborization fields. At 6-7 days post-fertilization, the same ten arborization fields (nine contralateral, one bilateral) were evident. Most of the arborization fields were located in the superficial neuropil and were not associated with morphologically identifiable clusters of somata. On the basis of various landmarks, the ten arborization fields are identified as precursors of retinorecipient nuclei previously described in other adult cypriniform fishes. The development was characterized by the nearly complete absence of any transient projections. Thus, the idea that axonal outgrowth is initially exuberant and trimmed back later is not supported by these results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burrill et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a213325dd404b250c9d27f1https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903460410
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Selective collateral elimination in early postnatal development restricts cortical distribution of rat pyramidal tract neurones1982 · 437 citations
  2. 2Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals1988 · 859 citations
  3. 3Development of the Rat's Uncrossed Retinotectal Pathway and Its Relation to Plasticity Studies1979 · 378 citations
  4. 4The formation of retinotectal projections1982 · 44 citations
  5. 5Factors involved in the development of ipsilateral retinothalamic projections in Xenopus laevis.1981 · 31 citations