PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2016Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology22 citationsOpen Access

Multielectrode Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Single Tip Wide Area Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
LBLucas V.A. BoersmaPVPepijn van der VoortPDPhilippe Debruyne

Structured PICO

Does multielectrode-phased radiofrequency ablation reduce procedure time and maintain freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to standard focal irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
120 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=120), mean age 57 years, 25% female, multinational. Key inclusion: all had at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug failure.
I
Intervention
Multielectrode-phased radiofrequency ablation (MEA)
C
Comparator
Standard focal irrigated radiofrequency ablation (STA) using 3-dimensional navigation
O
Outcome
Freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 monthshard clinical

Multielectrode-phased radiofrequency ablation offers significantly shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times than standard focal ablation for paroxysmal AF, with comparable acute success but slightly lower 12-month arrhythmia freedom.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-shot ablation techniques may facilitate safe and simple pulmonary vein isolation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Multielectrode pulmonary vein isolation versus single tip wide area catheter ablation-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is the first multinational, multicenter, prospective, noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing multielectrode-phased radiofrequency ablation (MEA) to standard focal irrigated radiofrequency ablation (STA) using 3-dimensional navigation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized to MEA (61 patients) or STA (59 patients). Preprocedure transesophageal echocardiogram and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (also 6-month postprocedure) were performed. Mean age was 57 years, 25% female sex, BMI was 28, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 to 1 in 82%, 8% had previous right atrial ablation, whereas all had at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug failure. The MEA group had significantly shorter mean procedure time (96±36 versus 166±46 minutes, P50%. Freedom of atrial fibrillation for MEA and STA was 86.4% and 89.7% at 6 months, dropping to 76.3% and 81.0% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, MEA and STA had similar rates of single-procedure acute pulmonary vein isolation without serious adverse events in the first 30 days. MEA had slightly lower long-term arrhythmia freedom, but showed marked and significantly shorter procedure, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency energy times. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01696136.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boersma et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21345ec4e60624665acbd8https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.115.003151
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper