Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical formulation calculates vibrational frequencies in small to medium size molecules, highlighting implications for computational efficiency.
Analytical formulation of the second-order geometrical derivatives of energy for the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB) method is presented. To test its quality and numerical performance, the derived formalism has been coded and applied for calculation of harmonic vibrational frequencies for a set of 17 small and medium size molecules. For this set, the average absolute deviation from experiment is 99 cm(-1) for SCC-DFTB vs 62 cm(-1) for the Møller-Plesset second-order perturbation theory with the cc-pVDZ basis set (MP2/cc-pVDZ) and 32 cm(-1) for the B3LYP density functional method with the same basis set (B3LYP/cc-pVDZ), while the maximal deviation is 465 cm(-1) vs 1,741 cm(-1) for MP2/cc-pVDZ and 112 cm(-1) for B3LYP/cc-pVDZ. The SCC-DFTB results are in reasonable agreement with experiments as well as with ab initio and density-functional results, and are better than other semiempirical methods. The SCC-DFTB method allows for considerable computational time saving when compared to other methods while retaining similar overall accuracy. Data for a series of conjugated polyenes show that an analytical formulation of SCC-DFTB is noticeably faster than its numerical formulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witek et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: