Why the study?
Does active recovery improve lactate removal and subsequent skating performance in male ice hockey players compared to passive recovery?
Does active recovery improve lactate removal and subsequent skating performance in male ice hockey players compared to passive recovery?
Active recovery via low-intensity cycling does not significantly enhance lactate removal or subsequent repeated sprint performance compared to passive resting in ice hockey players.
Active recovery confers no benefit over passive in hockey players; leaves open optimal recovery strategies for intermittent sports.
This study examined the effect of active and passive recovery on lactate concentration and subsequent performance of repeated work bouts in 18 male NCAA Division I ice hockey players. Using a repeated measures design, subjects performed a series of skating tests before and after a 15-minute recovery. The skating test consisted of skating a course for 7 shifts, which lasted 40 seconds per shift with 90 seconds rest between shifts. Active recovery (low-intensity cycling) and passive recovery (sitting) lasted for 15 minutes and were followed by an identical 7-shift skating test. Passive vs. active recovery showed no statistically significant differences for distance skated, heart rate, or lactate. There appeared to be a trend for greater skating distance in period 2 when active recovery was used, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). It was concluded that active recovery did not enhance lactate removal or subsequent performance of repeated work bouts in simulated hockey play.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LAU et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: