Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the limitation of low imaging speed. Acceleration methods using under-sampled k-space data have been widely exploited to improve data acquisition without reducing the image quality. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) is the most commonly used method for multi-channel imaging. However, SENSE has the drawback of severe g-factor artifacts when the under-sampling factor is high. This paper applies generative adversarial networks (GAN) to remove g-factor artifacts from SENSE reconstructions. Methods: Our method was evaluated on a public knee database containing 20 healthy participants. We compared our method with conventional GAN using zero-filled (ZF) images as input. Structural similarity (SSIM), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), and normalized mean square error (NMSE) were calculated for the assessment of image quality. A paired student’s t-test was conducted to compare the image quality metrics between the different methods. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.01. Results: The proposed method outperformed SENSE, variational network (VN), and ZF + GAN methods in terms of SSIM (SENSE + GAN: 0.81±0.06, SENSE: 0.40±0.07, VN: 0.79±0.06, ZF + GAN: 0.77±0.06), PSNR (SENSE + GAN: 31.90±1.66, SENSE: 22.70±1.99, VN: 31.35±2.01, ZF + GAN: 29.95±1.59), and NMSE (×10−7) (SENSE + GAN: 0.95±0.34, SENSE: 4.81±1.33, VN: 0.97±0.30, ZF + GAN: 1.60±0.84) with an under-sampling factor of up to 6-fold. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using GAN to improve the performance of SENSE reconstruction. The improvement of reconstruction is more obvious for higher under-sampling rates, which shows great potential for many clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: