Why the study?
Do signal-averaged ECG criteria adjusted for sex, age, and myocardial infarction location improve the prediction of arrhythmic events in patients after myocardial infarction compared to unadjusted criteria?
Do signal-averaged ECG criteria adjusted for sex, age, and myocardial infarction location improve the prediction of arrhythmic events in patients after myocardial infarction compared to unadjusted criteria?
Adjusting signal-averaged ECG criteria for sex, age, and MI location produces a more uniform predictive performance for arrhythmic events post-MI, though it does not improve overall sensitivity and specificity compared to unadjusted QRS duration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adjusted QRSd for uniform post-MI arrhythmic prediction across subgroups; leaves open prospective validation versus unadjusted criteria.
BACKGROUND: The objectives were to investigate the factors influencing signal-averaged ECGs (SAECGs) recorded in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) and to develop criteria for predicting arrhythmic events (AEs) that account for these factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: SAECGs were recorded 5 to 15 days after MI in 2461 patients without bundle-branch block. The duration (QRSd), terminal potential (VRMS), and terminal duration (LAS) of the filtered QRS were measured. During follow-up (17 +/- 8 months), AEs (arrhythmic death; ventricular tachycardia, VT; ventricular fibrillation, VF) occurred in 80 patients (3.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that QRSd discriminated patients with all types of AEs, but VRMS and LAS discriminated only VT patients; QRSd minus LAS also discriminated AE patients. Sex, age, and MI location significantly affected the SAECG; survivors without VT or VF were divided into subgroups (2 sex x 4 age x 2 MI), and QRSd values exceeding the 70th percentile in each subgroup predicted AEs with a sensitivity of 65.4%. An unadjusted QRSd criterion showed the same overall sensitivity and specificity but with less uniform values for each subgroup. A Cox model was constructed by use of multiple prognostic indicators, and in rank order, QRSd, previous MI, and Killip class were predictive of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: SAECG adjustments for sex, age, and MI location did not improve sensitivity and specificity but produced a more uniform predictive performance. The proposed criteria are based only on QRSd, because late potentials (VRMS and LAS) did not discriminate patients with sudden death. Duration of high-level activity during QRS (QRSd-LAS) can predict AEs, suggesting that the arrhythmogenic substate involves a large mass of myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savard et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: