Long before the cold war and the I ron C urtain's construction, the E uropean continent was marked by a developmental divide in which the east suffered relative economic deprivation compared to the west. This article revisits the sources of ‘economic backwardness’ in eastern E urope and asks whether post‐communist states' membership in the E uropean U nion ( EU ) upends the earlier structural conditions that had traditionally prevented east–west economic convergence. The article finds that while there is more economic opportunity for post‐communist states in the EU than outside it, EU membership does not subvert the major drivers of the developmental divide. EU membership does, however, limit economic volatility for the N ew M ember S tates ( NMS ), which, in historical perspective, is a boon for eastern populations and stabilizing for democratic politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachel A. Epstein (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: