Key result
The occurrence of a thromboembolic event with progressive disease was associated with a significantly higher mortality risk (HR 1.55) compared to patients without thromboembolic events.
Why the study?
Antiangiogenetic therapy and lung cancer are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, motivating an evaluation of their pattern, outcome, and influence on survival in advanced NSCLC.
Does the occurrence of thromboembolic events with or without progressive disease impact the overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy?
Cohort (n=427)
No
Does the occurrence of thromboembolic events with or without progressive disease impact the overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy?
In advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy, thromboembolic events occurring without progressive disease do not negatively impact overall survival, whereas those occurring alongside progressive disease portend worse outcomes.
TE with progressive disease signals higher mortality risk in advanced NSCLC on antiangiogenics; hypothesis-generating for whether preventing such events improves outcomes.
Background: Antiangiogenetic therapy and lung cancer, per se, are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE). We aim to evaluate the pattern and outcome of TE as well as its influence on survival time of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study, which included advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy. All TE were confirmed by objective image studies. We disclosed the presentation and risk factors of TE and evaluated its influence on outcome. Results: A total of 427 patients were included. TE occurred in 43 patients (10.1%). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was the most common TE (n = 20). Up to 46.2% of DVT did not occur in the typical lower extremities. Two patients died of TE. Among patients with continuous use or reuse of antiangiogenetic therapy, 18.2% had recurrent TE events. At the occurrence of TE, 28 patients experienced progressive disease (TE with PD), while tumor status remained stable in another 15 patients (TE without PD). The post-TE survival of patients without and with PD were 8.9 months (95% CI 3.9-13.9) vs 2.2 months (95% CI 0.1-4.3), P = 0.012. As compared with patients without TE (31.4 months [95% CI 27.1-35.7]), TE with PD patients experienced a significantly shorter overall survival (20.1 months [95% CI 15.5-24.6]), but TE without PD patients had comparable survival time (32.7 months [95% CI 7.4-28.1]) (P = 0006). The use of hormone analogue and proteinuria predicted the events among TE with PD group (aOR 2.79 [95% CI 1.13=6.92]; P = 0.027) and TE without PD group (aOR 4.30 [95% CI 1.13-16.42]; P = 0.033), respectively. Conclusion: Owing to the different risk factors and influences on the survival time, TE with and without PD may be two different disease entities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on antiangiogenic therapy (n=427). Thromboembolic event with progressive disease (TE with PD) vs. No thromboembolic event was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.34, p=0.036). The occurrence of a thromboembolic event with progressive disease was associated with a significantly higher mortality risk (HR 1.55) compared to patients without thromboembolic events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Cancer Management and Research