Key result
A time-to-event deep learning model combining clinical and imaging data outperformed standard perfusion abnormality measures in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (AUC 0.74 vs 0.71).
Why the study?
Standard clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging predicts MACE, but personalizing predictions to a specific event type and time interval remains challenging.
Does an explainable deep learning model using MPI and clinical features improve time-specific risk prediction for death, ACS, and revascularization compared to conventional perfusion abnormality measures?
Observational (n=34,389)
Yes
Does an explainable deep learning model using MPI and clinical features improve time-specific risk prediction for death, ACS, and revascularization compared to conventional perfusion abnormality measures?
A deep learning model combining clinical and SPECT MPI data provides superior, individualized, time-specific risk prediction for death, ACS, and revascularization compared to conventional perfusion abnormality measures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve short-term MACE risk stratification beyond perfusion measures; leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical adoption.
Standard clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has proven prognostic value for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, personalizing predictions to a specific event type and time interval is more challenging. We demonstrate an explainable deep learning model that predicts the time-specific risk separately for all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and revascularization directly from MPI and 15 clinical features. We train and test the model internally using 10-fold hold-out cross-validation (n = 20,418) and externally validate it in three separate sites (n = 13,988) with MACE follow-ups for a median of 3.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.6, 3.6). We evaluate the model using the cumulative dynamic area under receiver operating curve (cAUC). The best model performance in the external cohort is observed for short-term prediction - in the first six months after the scan, mean cAUC for ACS and all-cause death reaches 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.77) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.79), respectively. The model outperforms conventional perfusion abnormality measures at all time points for the prediction of death in both internal and external validations, with improvement increasing gradually over time. Individualized patient explanations are visualized using waterfall plots, which highlight the contribution degree and direction for each feature. This approach allows the derivation of individual event probability as a function of time as well as patient- and event-specific risk explanations that may help draw attention to modifiable risk factors. Such a method could help present post-scan risk assessments to the patient and foster shared decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pieszko et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing clinically indicated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (n=34,389). Time-to-event deep learning model (clinical and imaging data) vs. Perfusion abnormality (stress total perfusion deficit) was evaluated on Prediction of MACE at 1 year (AUC) (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.73-0.76, p=<0.001). A time-to-event deep learning model combining clinical and imaging data outperformed standard perfusion abnormality measures in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (AUC 0.74 vs 0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: