Hospital-at-home care encompasses 88 dimensions and components across seven categories, most commonly highlighting cost savings, patient and family satisfaction, and reduced re-admissions.
Systematic Review (n=179)
Hospital-at-home care encompasses diverse dimensions including benefits like cost savings and patient satisfaction, as well as various challenges and management factors that policymakers should consider.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hospital-at-home (HaH) care is known as a healthcare delivery approach providing acute care services at home as an alternative to traditional hospital care. This study aimed to explore the dimensions and components of HaH care. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The databases including ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the Wiley online library were searched for articles on HaH care dimensions and components of from early 2000 to February 19, 2024. The inclusion criteria of the study included articles published in the English language, and and those pertaining to various dimensions and components of HaH care. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist and data were analysed using the framework analysis method. RESULTS: A total of 4078 articles were retrieved. After screening and quality assessment, 179 articles were included in the review, identifying 88 dimensions and components of HaH care across seven main categories: benefits, challenges and obstacles, facilitators, management-related factors, medical conditions, factors associated with patients and their families, and factors associated with caregivers. The common components included cost savings (n = 30), patient and family satisfaction (n = 23), reduction in re-admissions (n = 13), medication management (n = 12), communication, coordination, and cooperation among healthcare teams, patients, and families (n = 12), preferences of patients and families (n = 12), and education of patients, families, and healthcare teams (n = 10). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, HaH includes many and diverse dimensions and components. So, healthcare policymakers and planners are urged to consider the dimensions and components of HaH care including benefits, challenges and obstacles, facilitators, management-related factors, medical conditions, factors associated with patients and their families, and factors associated with caregivers when developing models and programs to ensure effective outcomes following implementation.
Nikmanesh et al. (Mon,) conducted a systematic review in Hospital-at-home care (n=179). Hospital-at-home care vs. Traditional hospital care was evaluated on Dimensions and components of hospital-at-home care. Hospital-at-home care encompasses 88 dimensions and components across seven categories, most commonly highlighting cost savings, patient and family satisfaction, and reduced re-admissions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: